URGENT !
Please write letters to your local State Members or Ministers To Margaret Keech Brisbane - MINISTER FOR CHILD SAFETY - from Glynis - Child Abuse - To Margaret Keech Brisbane Dear Minister Margaret Keech, Surely one of the greatest safety issues for our children is the right, in a supposedly civilised country such as Australia, to pure clean POTABLE water? Anyone who takes SIMPLY A PEEK at the ACTUAL SCIENCE - not the political rhetoric being shoved down our throats (Australia has done NO RESEARCH ON THIS ), has to beg the question " WHY?" Why are we going to poison our children? Why are you as the Government Minister to look after our children going to poison them? In case you have not read Emeritus Professor Paul Connett's 50 reasons NOT to Fluoridate then I will attach a copy here and I will ask you respectfully to read this précis, the result of hard scientific evidence by 1000's of Researchers, and to speak up for our children as they have NO VOICE ( not that we adults have one either nowadays?). Respectfully, this seems to me to be worse than sexual abuse or other issues as this will affect EVERY SINGLE ONE OF OUR QLD CHILDREN WHO ALL WILL BE INGESTING A NEUROTOXIN WHICH WILL DUMB THEM DOWN AND AFFECT THEIR IQ'S - AS THIS IS THE OVERWHELMING SCIENTIFIC THE USA DENTAL ASSOCIATION ....... They themselves issue a warning about these neurotoxic effects ON INFANTS. Are you Minister Keech going to insist that, as our children’s safety I CERTAINLY DO NOT MIND IF YOU PASS THIS ON TO ANOTHER DEPARTMENT AS WELL - AS MANY MINISTER'S AS POSSIBLE SHOULD LOOK AT THE ETHICS AND MORALS BEHIND THIS FORCED MASS-MEDICATION WITH A CLASSIFIED POISON AND NEUROTOXIN. However, with all due respect as a woman, a mother, and a person of conscience (we have met at Arundel at the elections there), these CRITICAL questions need to be addressed NOW. I am looking forward to your quick response, as the commencement date mentioned above is only a day away. Sincerely, B.A (ACS) Griffith, (Trainer); Dip Pharm (Wits) GOLD COAST WATER WATCH
Why is a Scheduled S7 poison being forced in to our drinking and bathing and cooking water, which the Supplier REDOX warns " can cause cardiac arrest and respiratory failure" amongst all the other cancer affects such as osteosarcoma in teen boys who ingest it between the age of 6-8 years of age? Please read Redox's Warning attached.
Can you explain why our children (and mothers - and infirmed - and
elderly) will be forced to be mass-medicated by this noxious classified S7 poison - and Vic and NSW;s fluoridation is NO COMPARISON, as their dose is so low in comparison, but bad enough anyway .
EVIDENCE BASED TRUTH ABOUT FLUORIDATION AS ADMITTED EVEN BY THE BODY THAT ASSISTS IN THE PROPAGATION OF THE FRAUDULENT NOTION THEMSELVES
is paramount in civilised Australia,- and Queensland- that a warning
needs to be issued for PREGNANT MOTHERS AND INFANTS NOT TO DRINK THE WATER FROM OUR PUBLIC SUPPLY FROM MONDAY 1 DECEMBER 2008?
So, respectfully, please look at the hard evidence and raise questions about ALL Queensland's children's HEALTH AND SAFETY from 1st December 2008. This is too important an issue for any politician to ignore even at fear of one's job, as we will not re-elect those responsible for this travesty, anyway.
Glynis Tason
To Anna Bligh from M Haines Queenslanders For Safe Water, Air & Food Inc Media Statement: M Haines 30 September 2008. On Spencer Howson’s show on 612 ABC radio this morning, several people phoned in to express their opposition to Anna Bligh’s forced fluoridation as one explanation for Anna Bligh's falling poll results published in today’s Courier Mail. Anna Bligh then rang in and justified her position on forced fluoridation saying, “just look at the children’s dental decay rates” However, examining Queensland Children’s Dental decay honestly would give the Premier no comfort. By the time children in Townsville have drunk fluoridated water for 12 years they have more tooth decay than do children from the Gold Coast, North Brisbane, Wynnum and several other Health Districts without fluoride (the last 3 published Qld Children’s Dental Health Surveys show this) The last two Australian Children’s Dental surveys show children from the ACT (100 % fluoridated) have more decay in their permanent teeth by the time they are twelve yrs old than do children from Queensland and Queensland varies from being slighter better than, to just slightly worse than children from Tasmania (83% fluoridated). The last National Adult Oral Health survey shows that Queensland is very comparable to other states in every aspect of Oral Health. When Anna Bligh announced on the 5th Dec 2007 that she had made the decision that fluoridation was to be forced in Queensland, she presented a graph of tooth decay measured in 1991 of Townsville vs Brisbane. These same graphs were sent to some Qld MPs. It has, however, been discovered that Qld Health had changed the data in these graphs from “teeth surfaces” to “teeth” keeping the same numerical figure but falsely changing the units, thus exaggerating any tooth decay difference up to 4 to 5 fold. Teeth have either 4 or 5 surfaces depending on type of tooth. One rotten molar is just one tooth, not five teeth as Anna Bligh and Queensland Health would have us believe. The Crime and Misconduct Commission has advised that Queensland Health in due course should respond as to why the data was changed. Six months later, we are still waiting. The World Health Organisation recommends the International standard for comparison of tooth decay is permanent teeth at age 12 yrs. Queensland Health, the Premier and the Health Minister refuse to acknowledge any of this available data (which shows very little difference between fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas) and will only refer to decay in baby teeth at age 5yrs which shows a small difference in absolute terms, but a seeming big difference when expressed as a percentage. Anna Bligh has a large media staff doing their job of keeping the Premier in the news. It is recommended that the Premier seek additional staff to check the accuracy and validity of claims about Queensland children’s tooth decay before any future claims are made. Media contact. M Haines (07) 31370510 mob 0418 777112 Queenslanders For Safe Water, Air and Food Inc.
To Anna Bligh from Leigh Hutton Leigh Hutton care of post office Bongaree Premier Anna Bligh P O CITY EAST QLD 4002 FAX 07-3221 3631 Dear Premier Bligh, I read in the Sunday Mail You are aware of the following: · The Sunday Mail states on page 5 that you said – “It is my job and the responsibility of government to listen to the will of the people.” · Page 5 mentions that - “Public comment was sought …” ”Ms Bligh said the message was clear from the submissions, including a petition with about 3,000 signatures.” “A safety audit will now be undertaken …”Should the detail above be incorrect, please advise me immediately. You would and should further be aware that: v I have not appointed either you, Health Minister Stephen Robertson, Dr Jeannette Young, Mick Reid nor Michael Foley as my medical doctor to treat or help prevent any possible disease of dental caries. v You are allegedly adding [toxic waste] ‘fluoride’ to the water to help prevent the disease of dental caries. v You are forcing us to consume recycled sewage, industrial, hospital and morgue waste and treating us as ‘Living Lab Rats’¹, contrary to Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is Schedule 2 of the Commonwealth of Australia legislation, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986. v Any harm caused to people by your actions may fit the definition of section 328 [Negligent acts causing harm] of the Criminal Code Act 1899, this is in conjunction with section 4 of the Water Fluoridation Act 2008 – Object of Act “…the safe fluoridation of public potable water supplies …”, section 94 of the Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 “Purpose of drinking water quality management plan The purpose of a drinking water quality management plan is to protect public health.” and section 12 (1) of the Dangerous Goods Safety Management Act 2001 quote – “A hazardous material is a substance with potential to cause harm to persons.” v Direct consumption of recycled sewage is only practised in v Kindly explain why – (a) You refuse to ascertain the will of the people regarding the forced consumption / medication with toxic waste water fluoridation and recycled sewage, via a referendum², in a matter as important as everyone’s health and wellbeing? (b) You have never sought public comment on the forced addition and consumption of class 6 or 7 poisons in the form of toxic industrial waste ‘fluoride’ and recycled sewage, industrial, hospital, morgue and abattoir waste to our water supply? (c) You believe you have the right to do to myself and my family, [including a grandchild who has a sensitivity to some chemicals], what no doctor is legally or ethically able to do to us, without being charged under the Criminal Code Act 1899? I request your truthful response by Please do not insult my intelligence by Stephen Beckett or any adviser, giving the standard form letter rubbish response, please simply answer the questions above. Be advised that should you not respond and / or avoid specific truthful answers to my questions above by Friday the 14th of November 2008, I will regard this as your tacit admission that: 1. You know the toxic waste ‘fluoridating’ chemicals and recycled sewage, hospital and morgue waste poisons are dangerous to a large percentage of the people forced to consume such toxic poisons. 2. You have no intention to determine the will of the people in the matter of forced ‘medication’ / consumption of toxic waste ‘fluoride’ and recycled sewage. 3. You are not concerned about the true good health of all 4. You may have been ill informed and mislead by your advisers for reasons unknown, or you are deliberately intending to harm some of the people. Be further advised that I write this NOTICE under section 45 - Innocent intentions, of the Criminal Code Act 1899 to indicate that you may have been mistaken in your counsels and to point out defects in the legislation (i.e. no legislation to add arsenic, lead, mercury, Uranium-238 etc in ANY quantity) and the administration of justice with the view to the urgent reformation of such errors and defects. Note – I DO NOT CONSENT TO THE ADDITION OF A CLASS 6 or 7 POISON along with toxic POLLUTANTS - ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, COPPER, ZINC, IRON, CADMIUM, URANIUM-238 [& its decay rate products], DIESEL FUEL, KEROSENE, AMINES, NICKEL in ANY QUANTITY, nor to being treated as ‘Living Lab Rats’. Be advised that either your response or your non-response by I look forward to your response by Yours faithfully, Leigh Hutton All rights reserved References: ¹See attached page 11 of an FOI relating to the Toowoomba recycled sewage / hospital waste referendum. ²A 2003 c.c. Health Minister Stephen Robertson; Dr Jeannette Young; Mick Reid QH; 4BC [Greg Cary]; ABC Radio [Spencer Howson]; Channel 7; Channel 9; Channel 2; Mackay Daily Mercury; Courier Mail. Including covering letter. As Lord Keynes famously said – "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?" Re: Listening to the WILL of the PEOPLE
To Anna Bligh from Aileen Smith Dear Premier Bligh You have stated many times that there is no scientific proof regarding the health hazards created by fluoride - S7 poison - industrial waste from the phosphate fertilizer industry. This is the type of scientific research available to you, if you choose to review it - Intern. J. Environ. Studies 56: 435-449 1999 Water Treatment with Silicofluorides and Lead Toxicity R.D. Masters, M.J. Coplan Department of Government, Dartmouth College and Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research, H.B. 6222, Hanover, NH 03755 (USA); Intellequity, 38 Silver Hill, 8 Natick, MA 01760 (USA We report here on an additional "risk co-factor" making lead and other toxic metals in the environment more dangerous to local residents: the use of silicofluorides as agents in water treatment. The two chemicals in question - fluosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride - are toxins that, despite claims to the contrary, do not dissociate completely and change water chemistry when used under normal water treatment practices. As a result, water treatment with silicofluorides apparently functions to increase the cellular uptake of lead. Data from lead screening of over 280,000 children in Please study the attached "SCIENTIFIC PROOF" and then, show you are the "courageous lover of the people "you purport to be and reverse the decision to forcibly add fluoride into our drinking water. Yours sincerely, Aileen Smith info@aileensmith.com.au
Dear Reader Could you please forward this email to premier Bligh so that she personally reads it. There are lives at stake here. This is not a game. If she does care about the people she does need to read this herself. I ask that you see that she gets it and respectfully request that she, personally reply to me on this matter Thank you. Aileen Smith
|
To Phil Gray from Narelle To: Phil Gray MP Dear Sir
Yesterday, I received a free copy of Gold Coast October - November '08's publication through the mail and was horrified to read the latest regarding recycled sewerage into our drinking water.
I'm not Einstein, just an average person trying to make ends meet. However, I have had health issues previously and can not believe that anyone in their right mind would be placing sewerage waste and industrial waste in our water supply. I don't want to bath in it, let alone drink it !
The human body is not mean't to process poisons, pharmaceutical drugs, and everything else that people pour down the plug hole. DO YOU PEOPLE NOT HAVE CHILDREN ! My husband and I don't have kids, but are absolutely astonished at this decision.
Why can't we dam all of the water running into the ocean in the
I'm not a greenie, just someone that understands the human body will not accept poisons, pollutions, industrial waste, sewerage and everything else that will be getting recycled.
Surely it's not too late to stop this stupidity, what ever happened to common sense ?
Regards, Narelle Response From: Gaven Electorate Office
----- Original Message -----
To: Sent: Subject: RE: Recycled Sewage for Drinking ! Nacelle The government has no plans to use recycled water in Gold Coast Drinking supplies. The SEQ water pipeline will provide water across the whole of the region. the story is mischievous nonsense. Cheers Phil Gray MP
|
To Lawrence Springborg from David Evans To Lawrence Springborg Leader of the Opposition Leader of the LNP Email: dave.evans@macsc.com.au Telephone: 0401784513 Message: I understand next year is an election year, and I correct? I am extremely concerned with Anna Bligh\'s disregard toward Queenslander\'s health and wellbeing, and would like to know where you Dave Evans Network Commercial Producer Reply From: Leader [mailto:Leader@opposition.qld.gov.au] Sent: Tuesday, 28 October 2008 15:55 To: Dave Evan Subject: RE: A New Message from Springborg.com Dear Mr Evans I write to acknowledge receipt of your email sent 17th October 2008 regarding the fluoridation of Queensland water supplies. On March 13 2008, State Parliament passed legislation to introduce fluoride into Queensland's water supplies. After careful consideration of all the issues and opinions that were expressed, the LNP arrived at it's decision to support the Water Fluoridation Bill 2008 and push for two key amendments. These were that Water Fluoridation should only proceed after a public referendum and that the Government provide a rebate scheme for part of the cost of purchasing a reverse osmosis water filter. Unfortunately the Bligh Labor Government voted against both our reasonable amendments in Parliament. I believe these amendments would have benefited Queenslanders and given than a say in such an important decision. Thank you again for your interest. Yours sincerely Lawrence Springborg Leader of the Opposition Leader of the LNP Response Lawrence Springborg Leader of the Opposition Leader of the LNP Dear Mr Springborg, I thank you for your reply! It seems a little forceful that they are not going to be giving rebates for those who need reverse osmosis don’t you think? There has to be another agenda behind it all. After all, it used to be illegal to Mass Medicate - simply against the constitution. ...’Parliament shall have the power to change laws for the wellbeing etc. BUT NOT SO AS TO AUTHORIZE ANY FORM OF CONSCRIPTION (MEDICAL, DENTAL, ETC). But hey laws can be changed to suit different agendas, right? I appreciate the fact that you put these matters forth to Parliament.. but as our opposition leader you cannot just stand back and let this happen! You must realise that a lot of people in the country that have had issues with fluoride have come to QLD to get away from it as there is no funding for water treatment! So all those that have kidney and bone problems now are going to be forcefully fed toxic poison that will make them sicker. And that’s just the fluoride! The recycled sewerage is even more a disgusting concept. CONTAMINATED WATER CANNOT BE DECONTAMINATED. If you shine the light on this dark project and expose the TRUTH you may well be favoured for any election we may have next year. I have attached some documents that prove that HFS is poison, if you would kindly peruse them for your own information. Thankyou for your ongoing support, and I, and many others, trust in you to bring this horrible, inhumane mass medication to a stop. Kindest regards, Dave Evans Network Commercial Producer
Name: Dave Evans
and your party stand on the issue of fluoridation and recycled sewerage
being implemented into our drinking water supply. I look forward to your response!
Kind regards,
What is the main ingredient in rat poison... SODIUM FLUORIDE. Is that all we, the people of Queensland, Australia, are to our 'leaders'. A pack of dirty rats? We are HUMAN BEINGS, and we are all related via Karma and may the universe bring justice to those who betray us and lie to us.